![]() |
||||||||||||
|
|
<= Previous | April
Issues Index | Next => Okay, after chemistry and physics I should have known the biologists would want their turn. I enjoyed biology back in high school, or at least I enjoyed the biology teachers. I managed to spend an amazing amount of time testing water in swamps, sifting bugs out of dirt, and building aquaria, largely because I didn't have to deal with the nonsense that ruled the rest of the school. So here are some thoughts on Biology, which probably concludes our little series.
A thing is right if it tends to preserve the stability, integrity, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong if it tends otherwise. If one could conclude as to the nature of the Creator from a study of his creation it would appear that God has a special fondness for stars and beetles. The "control of nature" is a phrase conceived in arrogance, born of the Neanderthal age of biology and philosophy, when it was supposed that nature exists for the convenience of man. Physics investigates the essential nature of the world, and biology describes a local bump. Psychology, human psychology, describes a bump on the bump. It is a monstrous abuse of the science of biology to teach it only in the laboratory. Life belongs in the fields, in the ponds, on the mountains, and by the seashore. Trying to determine the structure of a protein by UV spectroscopy was like trying to determine the structure of a piano by listening to the sound it made while being dropped down a flight of stairs.
Would you like to see quotes like these in your mail tomorrow morning? Our 10,000 loyal subscribers hate to miss a day, perhaps you should sign up now! No cost or obligation, just be open to the enlightenment waiting for you among our 22,500+ quotes.
|
|||||||||||
four
|
||||||||||||